In re: EAGLE FOOD CENTERS, INC., Chapter 11 et al., Debtors.

Case No. 03-15299 (PSH) (Jointly Administered).United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
August 24, 2004

ORDER UNDER 11 U.S.C. §§ 102(1), 105(a), AND 502(b) AND FED. R. BANKR. P. 3007 CONTINUING THE REORGANIZED DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO CERTAIN CLAIMS SET FORTH IN FOURTH OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO CLAIMS [EOD #1049]
PAMELA S. HOLLIS, Bankruptcy Judge

Upon the Reorganized Debtor’s Fourth Omnibus Objection to Claims Under 11 U.S.C. §§ 102(1), 105(a), and 502(b) and Fed.R.Bankr.P. 3007, dated May 25, 2004 (the “Objection”)[1]
filed by Eagle Food Centers, Inc. (“Eagle Foods,” or in reference to itself, the “Reorganized Debtor”); and it appearing that notice of the Objection was good and sufficient under the particular circumstances and that no other or further notice need be given; and after due deliberation thereon; and good cause appearing therefore;

Page 2

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

1. The Reorganized Debtor’s objection to each Claim listed onExhibit A attached hereto shall be continued and set for further status on September 23, 2004 at 11:00 a.m. or at such other time as may be agreed upon by the parties-in-interest.

2. This Order is without prejudice to the Reorganized Debtor’s right to object to any other Claims in these Chapter 11 cases or further object to Claims objected to herein.

3. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Reorganized Debtor and the Claimants whose Claims are subject to the Objection with respect to any matters related to or arising from implementation of this Order.

Page 3

ID Creditor Claim No. Claim Amount File Date Asserted Class

18152 RANDALI PLAZA ASSOCIATES 1760 $220,626.00 10/30/2003 GENERAL
AN ILLINOIS LTD PARTNERSHIP UNSECURED
C/O HAROLD MOSKOWITZ LAW OFFICES Asserted Debtor: EAGLE FOOD CENTERS, INC.
10 SOUTH LASALLE ST, STE 2930
CHICAGO IL 60603

Total Claims to be Disallowed: 1
Total Amount to be Disallowed: $220,626.00

[1] Unless otherwise defined, capitalized terms used herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Objection.

Page 1