IN MATTER OF BRIGHT (Bankr.N.D.Ind. 2005)


IN THE MATTER OF: JAMES LAMAR BRIGHT KAMETH VANAY BRIGHT, Debtors.

Case No. 05-11023.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division.
September 19, 2005

DECISION AND ORDER
ROBERT GRANT, Bankruptcy Judge

The notice of motion and opportunity to object which Citifinancial Auto, Ltd. (hereinafter “Movant”) served in connection with its Motion for Relief from Stay does not comply with the requirements of N.D. Ind. L.B.R. B-2002-2 because:

a. The notice does not correctly state the date upon which the motion was filed. N.D. Ind. L.B.R. B-2002-2(c)(2). The motion was filed on August 24, 2005, while the notice refers to a motion filed on August 25, 2005.

Since creditors and parties in interest have not been given appropriate notice of the motion and the opportunity to object thereto, the court cannot grant it at this time. Movant shall prepare and serve an Amended Notice of Motion and Opportunity to Object which complies with N.D. Ind. L.B.R. B-2002-2 and file proof thereto within fourteen (14) days of this date. See, N.D. Ind. L.B.R. B-9013-4(a). The failure to do so will result in the motion being denied without prejudice and without further notice.

SO ORDERED.

Page 1