IN MATTER OF DOERING (Bankr.E.D.Mich. 9-5-2008)

IN THE MATTER OF: JOHN WILLIAM DOERING and RACHEL ELIZABETH DOERING, Chapter 7, Debtors. COMPTON PRINTING CO., INC., a Michigan corporation, Plaintiff, v. JOHN WILLIAM DOERING, II and RACHEL ELIZABETH DOERING, Defendants.

Case No. 08-42770-tjt, Adv. Proc. No. 08-04731-tjt.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.
September 5, 2008

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT, AS MOOT
THOMAS TUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge

This adversary proceeding is before the Court pursuant to Defendants’ Motion for More Definite Statement (Docket # 9). The Court notes that after the motion was filed, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint (Docket # 10). The motion therefore must be denied as moot. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for More Definite Statement (Docket # 9) is denied, as moot.

Page 1