CASE NUMBER 01-41593-293United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri
November 6, 2003
TENTH ORDER SUSTAINING, IN PART, DEBTORS’ OBJECTION TO CLAIMS NO. 6 (TAX CLAIMS)
DAVID McDONALD, Chief Judge, Bankruptcy
This matter having come before the Court on the Objection., toClaims No. 6 (Tax Claims)(the “Objection”) filed by the above-captioned debtors and debtors-in-possession (the “Debtors”); the Court having conducted a hearing on the Objection on April 11, 2002 and having entered its Order Sustaining, In Part, Debtors’ Objection toClaims No. 6 (Tax Claims) which, among other things, continued consideration of certain claims identified on Exhibits A and B to the Objection until May 15, 2002; the Court having conducted a hearing on the Objection on May 15, 2002 and having entered its Second OrderContinuing Debtors’ Objection to Claims No. 6 (Tax Claims), which continued consideration of the Debtors’ objection to six of the claims identified on Exhibits A and B to the Objection until June 12, 2002; the Court having conducted a hearing on the Objection on June 12, 2002 and having entered its Third Order Continuing Debtors’Objection to Claims No. 6 (Tax Claims), which continued consideration of the Debtors’ objection to six of the claims identified on Exhibits A and B to the Objection until July 17, 2002; the Court having conducted a hearing on the Objection on July 17, 2002 and having entered its Fourth Order Continuing Debtors’ Objection toClaims No. 6 (Tax Claims), which continued consideration of the Debtors’ objection to six of the claims identified on ExhibitsA and B to the Objection until September 5, 2002; the Court having conducted a hearing on the Objection on
Page 2
September 5, 2002 and having entered its Fifth OrderContinuing Debtors’ Objection to Claims No. 6 (Tax Claims), which continued consideration of the Debtors’ objection to six of the claims identified on Exhibits A and B to the Objection to October 16, 2002; the Court having conducted a hearing on the Objection on October 16, 2002 and having entered its Sixth Order ContinuingDebtors’ Objection to Claims No. 6 (Tax Claims), which continued consideration of the Debtors’ objection to six of the claims identified on Exhibit A to the Objection to November 14, 2002; the Court having conducted a hearing on the Objection on December 3, 2002, and having entered its Seventh Order Sustaining. In Part. Debtors’Objection to Claims No. 6 (Tax Claims), which sustained Debtors’ objection with respect to claim numbers 399 and 400, applied Debtors’ objection to claim numbers 1939 and 1940 (which amend and supercede claim numbers 400 and 399, respectively) and continued consideration of the Debtors’ objection to six of the claims identified on Exhibit A
to the Objection to January 27, 2003; the Court having conducted a hearing on the Objection on January 27, 2003, and having entered itsEighth Order Sustaining, In Part, Debtors’ Objection to Claims No. 6(Tax Claims), which continued consideration of the Debtors’ objection to six of the claims identified on Exhibit A to the Objection to March 25, 2003; the Court having conducted a hearing on the Objection on March 25, 2003, and having entered its Ninth OrderSustaining. In Part. Debtors’ Objection to Claims No. 6 (TaxClaims), which continued consideration of the Debtors’ objection to six of the claims identified on Exhibit A to the Objection; the Court having conducted a hearing on the Objection on September 22, 2003, and having entered its Stipulation And Order With Respect ToDebtors’ Objection To Claims No. 6 (Tax Claims) As It Relates To ProofsOf Claim Filed By The Tennessee Department Of Revenue, which resolved all issues related to claim numbers 1939 and 1940; the Court having conducted a hearing on the Objection on October 27, 2003, due and adequate notice of the Objection and the hearing thereon having been given, the Court having considered
Page 3
the statements of counsel and all other parties-in-interest and the Court being fully advised and for good cause shown,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
1. The hearing on the proofs of claim identified on Exhibit A
hereto shall be continued until December 8, 2003 at 11:00 a.m.
2. Proof of Claim No. 504, filed by the New York City Division of Finance and listed on Exhibit B hereto shall be allowed to the extent identified in the “Surviving Claim” column of Exhibit B.
Page 4
[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS DISTRIBUTION LIST.]Page 5
Page 1