In re: Vicki E. Brown Chapter 13 Debtor In re: Vicki E. Brown Debtor/Plaintiff v. GMAC Mortgage Creditor/Defendant.

Case No. 10 B 47983, Adversary Case No. 10-02213.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois.
January 18, 2011

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
JACK SCHMETTERER, Bankruptcy Judge

Findings of fact are based on the filed Adversary Complaint.

A. The Parties

1. The Plaintiff is Vicki E. Brown (“Plaintiff”).
2. The Defendant is GMAC Mortgage (“Defendant”).

B. Factual Background

1. On October 27, 2010, Plaintiff filed a petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code.
2. Plaintiff owns the real estate commonly known as 2455 Orchard St., Blue Island, Illinois (the “Property”).
3. GMAC Mortgage holds a first mortgage lien on the Property, with a secured claim of approximately $230,394.70 (the “First Mortgage”).
4. The Defendant holds a second mortgage lien on the Property of approximately $22,010.44 (the “Second Mortgage”).
5. The fair market value of the Property at the time of the filing of Plaintiff’s

Page 2

bankruptcy case number 10-47983 was $170,000.00.
6. On or about October 29, 2010, Plaintiff issued a Summons and Complaint to strip off a secondary lien on the Property.
7. On or about November 2, 2010, a copy of the Summons and Complaint was served in accordance with Rule 7004
of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure by Certified Mail, to an officer of the Defendant at 4 Walnut Grove Dr., Horsham, PA 19044, and the Defendant’s registered agent, Illinois Service Corporation, at 801 Adlai Stevenson Dr., Springfield, IL 62703.
8. The summons indicated that a motion or answer was required within 30 days of issuance. To date, no responsive pleading has been filed.
9. No evidence has been presented to challenge the validity of the secured claim that holds priority over the second mortgage lien.
10. No evidence has been presented to challenge the fair market value of $170,000.00.
11. The First Mortgage in the amount of approximately $230,394.70 exhausts the value and equity in the Property.
12. There is no value and equity to support the claim of the Defendant.

PROPOSED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(K). This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a) and § 1334(b).
2. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1409.
3. This action was initiated under 11 U.S.C. § 506(a) and F. R. Bankr. P. 3012.
4. The Plaintiff scheduled the first GMAC Mortgage secured claim in the amount of $230,394.70 and the second GMAC Mortgage claim in the amount of $22,010.44.
5. The value of Plaintiff’s residence is $170,000.00.

Page 3

6. There is no value or equity to support the Second Mortgage of GMAC Mortgage. The Second Mortgage lien of GMAC Mortgage is not a claim secured at all by a security interest in Plaintiff’s residence, as the term is used in § 1332(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. The Chapter 13 plan may value the collateral under F.R. Bankr. P. 3012 and determine the respective rights of secured creditors through the language used therein, contingent on confirmation thereof, completion of the plan by the Plaintiff/Debtor, and entry of the discharge. Nobelman v. Am. Say. Bank, 508 U.S. 324 (1993), In re Meyer, 2009 B 20268, Docket Entry 69 (Bankr. N.D. Ill., January 29, 2010).