IN RE: KERRICK L. FRANKLIN, NICOSIA L. FRANKLIN, CHAPTER 7, Debtors.

CASE NO. 07-60622.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.
March 15, 2007

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION (NOT INTENDED FOR PUBLICATION)
RUSS KENDIG, Bankruptcy Judge

This matter comes before the court sua sponte. Kerrick and Nicosia Franklin (hereinafter “Debtors”) filed a chapter 7 petition on March 8, 2007. Only one Official Form 1, Exhibit D was filed. It was signed by Kerrick Franklin. Kerrick Franklin marked the box stating that he received a briefing from a credit counseling agency approved by the United States trustee within the 180 days before the filing of the bankruptcy case and that a certificate of completion was attached to the petition. Each Debtor filed a certificate of completion with the petition. The certificate filed by Kerrick Franklin stated that he completed his credit counseling on March 20, 2006. Similarly, the certificate filed by Nicosia Franklin indicated that she completed her credit counseling on March 20, 2006.

This opinion is not intended for publication or citation. The availability of this opinion, in electronic or printed form, is not the result of a direct submission by the court.

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(1), an individual may not be a debtor unless he or she completed a credit briefing outlining the opportunities for credit counseling and assisting in performing a budget related analysis in the 180 days prior to filing the petition. The language of the statute is clear that this must be completed before filing the petition or the individual does not qualify to be a debtor. Similarly, the language of the statute is clear that the counseling does not qualify if taken more than 180 days prior to the bankruptcy filing.

The timing of this requirement is further amplified by the limited relief that is provided in the event of difficulty in obtaining the briefing. In the event of exigent circumstances, a debtor may defer this requirement, but this results in a specifically limited deferral and not a waiver. 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(3).

The circumstances resulting in a waiver of the briefing requirement are limited. For instance, section 109(h)(2) excuses the requirement of a briefing if the debtor resides in a district in which there are no approved credit counseling agencies to provide the briefing. That section is inapplicable in this district, however, as the United States Trustee has approved agencies to provide the required briefings in the Northern District of Ohio. There is a similarly limited exception for incapacity, disability, or active military duty in a combat zone. 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(4). Incapacity and disability are defined to limit use of the exception. The military exception could not be much more narrowly construed, as it requires the debtor to be in a combat zone.

Neither debtor fulfills the requirement of 11 U.S.C. § 109(h) in this case. The certificates are dated March 20, 2006, more than 180 days before the petition was filed. Therefore, Debtors would only be eligible for bankruptcy relief if they receive a waiver or limited deferral of the credit counseling requirement. The box on Official Form 1, Exhibit D requesting a waiver or limited deferral was not marked and no motion to waive or defer has been filed. As such, they are not eligible to be debtors and the court must dismiss the case.

A separate order is issued herewith.