In re: HA-LO Industries, Inc., et al.,[1] CHAPTER 11 Debtors.

CASE No. 02 B 12059 (JOINTLY ADMINISTERED) IL Docket No. ______United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
March 19, 2003

[1] The Debtors are HA-LO Industries, Inc., Lee Wayne Corporation, and Starbelly.com, Inc.

ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 327(a) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT AND RETENTION OF LEBOEUF, LAMB, GREENE MACRAE LLP AS ATTORNEYS FOR THE DEBTORS
CAROL A. DOYLE, United States Bankruptcy Judge.

Upon the application (the “Application”)[2] of the debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned Chaptcr 11 cases (the “Debtors”) seeking entry of an Order Pursuant to Section 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code Authorizing the Employment and Retention of LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene MacRae, LLP (“LeBoeuf Lamb”) as Attorneys for the Debtors; and upon the affidavit of Neal L. Wolf, a partner in the firm of LeBoeuf (the “Wolf Affidavit”); and the Court being satisfied based on the representations made in the Application and Wolf Affidavit that the partners, counsel and associates of LeBoeuf Lamb who will be engaged in these cases represent no interest adverse to the Debtors’ estates with respect to the matters upon which they are to be engaged, that they are disinterested persons as that term is defined under 11 U.S.C. § 101(14), as modified by 11 U.S.C. § 1107(b); and that their employment is necessary and would be in the best interest of the Debtors’ estates; and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefore, it is

ORDERED that the Application is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that in accordance with 11 U.S.C. § 327(a), the Debtors are authorized to employ and retain the firm of LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene
MacRae, LLP as their attorneys on the terms set forth in the Application and the Wolf Affidavit, effective as of February 20. 2003; and it is further

ORDERED that Orrick, Herrington Sutcliffe LLP is authorized to withdraw as counsel to the Debtors; and it is further

ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising from the implementation of this Order.

[2] Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as in the Application.