In re: NTELOS Inc. f/k/a CFW Communications Company, et al.,[1] , Chapter 11, Debtors

Case No. 03-32094 (DOT), (Jointly Administered)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia.
February 12, 2004

[1] The Debtors are the following entities: NTELOS Inc. f/k/a CFW Communications Company, NTELOS Wireless Inc. f/k/a CFW Wireless Inc. f/k/a CFW Cellular Inc., NTELOS of Maryland Inc., NTELOS of Kentucky Inc., NTELOS PCS North Inc. f/k/a NTELOS of Pennsylvania Inc., NTELOS Cable of Virginia Inc. f/k/a CFW Cable of Virginia Inc., NTELOS Communications Services Inc. f/k/a CFW Communications Services Inc., NTELOS NetAccess Inc. f/k/a NetAccess, Inc., NTELOS Telephone Inc. f/k/a CFW Telephone Inc. f/k/a Clifton Forge-Waynesboro Telephone Company, NTELOS Network Inc. f/k/a CFW Network, Inc., NTELOS Licenses Inc. f/k/a CFW Licenses Inc., NTELOS Cable Inc. f/k/a CFW Cable Inc., R B Communications, Inc., NTELOS Cornerstone Inc. f/k/a CFW Cornerstone, Inc., NTELOS PCS Inc. f/k/a CFW PCS Inc., Virginia RSA 6 Cellular Limited Partnership, Richmond 20MHz, LLC, NA Communications, Inc., Roanoke
Botetourt Telephone Company a/k/a Roanoke and Botetourt Telephone Company, R B Network, Inc., Botetourt Leasing, Inc., R B Cable, Inc., The Beeper Company, Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C., West Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. and Virginia Telecommunications Partnership.

Benjamin C. Ackerly, Michael C. Shepherd, HUNTON WILLIAMS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, of Counsel for the Debtors and Debtors in Possession

Frank J. Santoro, Karen M. Crowley, MARCUS, SANTORO KOZAK, P.C., Chesapeake, Virginia, of Counsel for the Debtors and Debtors in Possession

ORDER SUSTAINING DEBTORS’ OBJECTION TO CLAIM NUMBER 395
DOUGLAS TICE, Chief Judge, Bankruptcy

This matter came before the Court on the Debtors’ Third Omnibus Objection to Claims Under 11 U.S.C. § 102(1) and 105(a) and Bankruptcy Rule 3007 (the “Objection”) as it relates to the unsecured claim of Coverall of Virginia, Inc. (the “Claimant”), in the amount of $723.57 filed on June 2, 2003, designated claim number 395 (“Claim Number 395”).

It appearing to the Court that (i) by letter dated January 16, 2004, the Claimant responded to the Objection (the “Response”) and (ii) by letter dated February 5, 2004, the Claimant withdrew the Response; and it further appearing that the relief sought in the Objection with respect to Claim Number 395 is unopposed and is in the best interests of the above-captioned debtors and debtors-in-possession (the “Debtors”) and their bankruptcy estates;

THE COURT HEREBY FINDS THAT:

1. the Debtors’ objection to Claim Number 395 is SUSTAINED; and

Page 2

2. the Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Order as entered to the Debtors’ counsel at the address below who will then distribute the order to all creditors and parties in interest in these cases pursuant to the Local Bankruptcy Rules.