Case No. 09-66466.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.
February 1, 2010
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION
THOMAS TUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge
This case comes before the Court on a letter from Debtor dated January 26, 2010, filed on January 28, 2010 (Docket # 32) and a motion filed on December 17, 2009 (Docket # 29) (together, the “Motions”), which this Court construes as motions for reconsideration of, and for relief from, the December 1, 2010 Order dismissing this case (Docket # 27), and
The Court having reviewed and considered the Motions, and
The Court finds the Motions fail to demonstrate a palpable defect by which the Court and the parties have been misled, and that a different disposition of the case must result from a correction thereof. See Local Rule 9024-1(a)(3).
The Court also finds that the allegations in the Motions do not establish excusable neglect under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1), FedR.Bankr.P. 9024, or any other valid ground for relief from the order dismissing this case.
In addition, the Court notes the following: First, the Debtor still has not corrected the problems that led to the dismissal of this case. On December 17, 2009, Debtor filed a “corrected” signature page for the means test form, and a “corrected” signature page for the Statement of Financial Affairs. Each document was one page — the signature page only. That is not sufficient. Rather, Debtor was required to refile the entire document, signed, with respect to each of these forms. He did not do so. The Court’s notice of these defects in the original forms
Page 2
was mailed to the Debtor by the Bankruptcy Noticing Center on August 29, 2009 (see Docket ## 16, 17), yet Debtor has never corrected the deficiencies.
Second, the Court notes that its order dismissing this case did not bar the Debtor from filing a new bankruptcy case.
NOW, THEREFORE,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motions should be, and are, DENIED.