Case No. 02-13533 (AJG), (Jointly Administered).United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York.
May 10, 2005
Mark A. Shaiken, Esq., Greta A. McMorris, Esq., STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession.
FOURTH ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, DEBTORS’ SIXTY-SIXTH OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO PROOFS OF CLAIM — (PROPERTY TAX CLAIMS)
ARTHUR GONZALEZ, Bankruptcy Judge
Upon consideration of the Debtors’ Sixty-Sixth Omnibus Objection to Proofs of Claim (Tax Claims) filed by WorldCom, Inc. and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”), dated October 15, 2004, seeking the expungement and disallowance of proofs of claim; and it appearing that the Debtors have adjourned, without prejudice, the hearing on the proofs of claims identified on Exhibit A to July 26, 2005, 10:00 am prevailing Eastern time, and therefore the hearing on the proofs of claims identified on Exhibit A should be adjourned to July 26, 2005, 10:00 am prevailing Eastern time, without prejudice; and it appearing that the sales and use tax portion of the claims identified on Exhibit B have been resolved and therefore the proofs of claims identified on Exhibit B should be reduced by the sales and use portion of the claim; and after due consideration and sufficient cause appearing therefore, it is
Page 2
ORDERED that the hearings to consider the Debtors’ objections to the proofs of claim identified on Exhibit A are hereby adjourned until July 26, 2005 at 10:00 am prevailing Eastern time, and that the Debtors have expressly reserved their right to object to the adjourned claims on Exhibit A; and it is further
ORDERED that the proofs of claims identified on Exhibit B
have been resolved and therefore the proofs of claims identified on Exhibit B are hereby reduced by the sales and use portion of the claim; and it is further
ORDERED that, to the extent the Objection, as filed, objects to any proofs of claims not addressed by this Order (the “Remaining Disputed Proofs of Claim”), then the Debtors’ reserve their rights to further prosecute their objections against the Remaining Disputed Proofs of Claim and nothing herein shall limit, restrict, or otherwise affect the Debtors’ right to do so.
Page 3
Page 1