In re WORLDCOM, INC., et al., Chapter 11 Debtors.

Case No. 02-13533 (AJG), (Jointly Administered).United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York.
May 10, 2005

Mark A. Shaiken, Esq., Mark S. Carder, Esq., STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession.

FOURTH ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, DEBTORS’ SEVENTY-SEVENTH OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO PROOFS OF CLAIM (WIRELESS CLAIMS)
ARTHUR GONZALEZ, Bankruptcy Judge

The Court has considered the Debtors’ Seventy-Seventh Omnibus Objection to Proofs of Claim (Wireless Claims) filed by WorldCom, Inc. and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”), dated October 17, 2004 (the “Objection”). In the Objection, Debtors seek the disallowance and expungement of certain proofs of claim, as set forth in the Objections and the exhibits thereto. It appears to the Court that the treatment of claims subject to the Objection, as and to the extent provided herein, including the settlement and adjournment of various of Debtor’s objections, is in the best interest

Page 2

of the Debtors, their estates and their creditors and that good and sufficient notice was given in accordance with the Claim Objection Procedures Order.[1]

IT IS THEREFORE:

ORDERED that the proof of claim 30842 is hereby adjourned until July 26th, 2005, at 10 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, One Bowling Green, 5th Floor, New York, New York 10004-1408, and that the Debtors have expressly reserved and shall have the right to further object to such claim; and it is further

ORDERED that, to the extent the Objection, as filed, objects to any proofs of claims not addressed by this Order (the “Remaining Disputed Proofs of Claim”), the Debtors’ have reserved and shall have the right to further prosecute their objections against the Remaining Disputed Proofs of Claim and nothing herein shall limit, restrict, or otherwise affect the Debtors’ right to do so.

[1] Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall retain the same meaning ascribed to such term in the Objection.

Page 1